|
ASSISTANT
MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 07 MAY 07 |
|
401 to 403 Witness statement of Tiago Pires Luz da Silva
2007.05.07 |
|
2-Processos
Volume II
Pages 401 - 403 |
|
TRANSLATION BY INES
|
|
02_VOLUME_IIa_Page_401 |
 |
|
02_VOLUME_IIa_Page_402 |
 |
|
02_VOLUME_IIa_Page_403 |
 |
Tiago Pires Luz da Silva
Date/Time: 2007/05/07
18H15
Assistant Maintenance
Technician
Portuguese
Concerning the issue of the
process said;
. That he comes to the
process as a witness;
. Works in the Luz Ocean
Club (LOC) for approximately
three years and four months,
always in the club
maintenance service;
. This is his first job;
. Before this she completed
the 9th year of school;
. Makes roughly 500 euros
per month, and lunches in
club with food that he
brings from home;
. Has a fixed work schedule
that comprises the hours of
09H00 to 18H00, with a break
between 13H00 and 14H00 for
lunch;
. Normally, he does not
leave the establishment,
having coffee with his work
colleagues in the adult pool
bar;
. His day-to-day work
activities are placed next
to the principal reception,
the locale known as Palm
Bay;
. When there, a receptionist
records the service requests
and it is his duty to set
out to the domicile in
question, along with the
request, t carry out the
work in question, which
could mean pipe-repair,
electrical, small repairs in
painting, amongst others;
. The witness does not have
a zone of work defined, and
is sent to wherever it is
necessary;
. Questioned, he states that
he does not know the parents
of little Madeleine, the
little girl who disappeared,
and who were lodged in Block
5, in apartment A;
. He also does not know any
of the other elements who
accompanied the group lodged
at the apartment in
question;
. He also does not know a
date in which these people
arrived to the club;
. Regarding this, he states
that he did not effectuate
any service in the apartment
that they occupied, but
knows that Luis and Mario,
his colleagues, were sent
there regarding a request to
repair a blind and to give
explanation as to how to run
the washing machine. He
assumes that the family of
Madeleine was already there;
. After seeing a photograph
of little Madeleine, he
affirms that he never once
saw that child;
. On the day of the
disappearance of the child,
that next morning (04/05/07)
at around 01H23, he received
a telephone call from the
LOC reservations sector
which he did not answer. He
knows this because the
number appeared on his
mobile;
. When the telephone rang,
he was sleeping and when
looked at the ?display? of
the mobile it looked as
though what was recorded as
the name 'Relvas', instead
of 'Reservations', and
thought it was a friend of
his who often call shim at
odd hours, already
inebriated;
. It was around 08H20/08H30
of this same day when they
called again 'this time it
was Nuno, his colleague,
asking the witness to pay
particular attention for a
missing child' a 3 year old
missing since yesterday,
dressed in pyjamas, on his
way to the LOC;
. On his way to work, he did
not see observe anything
that would help located the
child;
. He went from Burgau to
Luz, in his car, accompanied
by this girlfriend who was
also informed;
. Questioned, states that he
did not notice, at any
moment, someone with an
unusual comportment, who
could in some form, be
related to the missing
child;
. If any situation comes to
light, he is perfectly aware
of the procedure he needs to
take, which is, the
communication with the
authorities, which he would
carry out without
reservation;
. Clarifies that he is at
the disposition of the
authorities for anything
that is necessary;
. And nothing more said,
Having read the statement,
finds it in conformity and
signs it;
. The document is duly
signed by me - Jose Luisa,
an Inspector with this
Policia Judiciara
|
|
|
TO HELP KEEP THIS SITE ON LINE PLEASE
CONSIDER |
|
|
|
|
